Sudanese diaspora communities and international human rights organisations are voicing concerns over the United Arab Emirates’ nomination of diplomat Lana Nusseibeh for the position of United Nations Secretary-General. Critics argue that her past defence of the UAE against allegations of supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) casts doubt on her independence and suitability for the role.
The controversy arises amid ongoing allegations that the UAE has been involved in supporting the RSF, which has been accused of committing severe human rights violations during the conflict with Sudan’s army. The RSF’s attack on El Fasher in October 2025 was described by the United Nations as having genocidal characteristics, intensifying scrutiny on Nusseibeh’s candidacy.
Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese women’s rights and pro-democracy activist, has questioned Nusseibeh’s ability to act independently of her government’s stance on Sudan. She warned that her nomination could undermine efforts to secure justice for victims of atrocities in the country. Other Sudanese activists share these concerns, fearing her appointment might weaken public confidence in the UN’s ability to hold powerful governments accountable.
Former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth has also criticized Nusseibeh’s previous responses to allegations about UAE support for the RSF, pointing to her denials as a potential issue for accountability in the role of UN Secretary-General.
Nusseibeh, however, has defended her candidacy, condemning the RSF’s actions in Sudan and pledging to support UN fact-finding missions and promote accountability if appointed. She has taken leave from her ministerial position in the UAE, emphasizing her commitment to the independence required for the UN’s top job.
The selection process for the next UN Secretary-General involves securing at least nine affirmative votes from the 15-member UN Security Council and avoiding a veto from any of its five permanent members: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, and Russia. The race remains competitive, with former Costa Rican vice-president Rebeca Grynspan also emerging as a strong contender. The debate surrounding Nusseibeh’s nomination has added further complexity to the selection process, highlighting broader concerns about the independence of international institutions.